From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932588Ab0KPVcp (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:32:45 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38733 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932173Ab0KPVco (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:32:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] SCSI host lock push-down From: James Bottomley To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jeff Garzik , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , Andrew Morton , linux-scsi , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: References: <1289606118.3015.539.camel@mulgrave.site> <20101113051635.GA11613@havoc.gtf.org> <20101116071029.GA13540@havoc.gtf.org> <1289929012.11405.12.camel@mulgrave.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:32:38 -0600 Message-ID: <1289943158.11405.261.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 13:30 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:36 AM, James Bottomley > wrote: > > > > I was thinking through next for a few days to see if anything breaks in > > the architectures with scsi drivers we can't compile on x86 ... but > > realistically that will happen in -rcX as well, so I'm happy either way. > > I really just wanted a firm "just take the patch" or "wait for a > pull", so that I can forget about this issue either way. > > But it sounds like I have an ack for you, so I might as well just take > the patch. You do ... if you need it formally: Acked-by: James Bottomley James