From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: ls & flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:07:35 -0500 Message-ID: <1290546410-sup-7975@think> References: <1290177036-sup-2385@think> <20101119144625.GB2579@localhost.localdomain> <1290473619-sup-3248@think> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Josef Bacik , Daniel J Blueman , Chris Ball , linux-btrfs To: Brian Sullivan Return-path: In-reply-to: List-ID: Excerpts from Brian Sullivan's message of 2010-11-23 15:27:09 -0500: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Chris Mason = wrote: > > Excerpts from Brian Sullivan's message of 2010-11-22 18:29:42 -0500= : > >> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote: > >> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Josef Bacik = wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:32:46AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> I just wanted to confirm, you're seeing this with 2.6.37-rc? =C2= =A0I thought > >> >>> I had fixed up this delalloc hammering. > >> >>> > >> > > >> > I installed 2.6.37-rc2 from an Ubuntu PPA. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Also can you run with this patch > >> >> > >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg06890.html > >> >> > >> > > >> > Will try tonight. > >> > > >> > >> Got 2.6.37-rc2 from kernel.org, applied this patch, and still not = able > >> to write to the filesystem. > > > > So with the patch are you still seeing the 100% system time? > > > > -chris > > >=20 > Yes, no change with patch. Ok, the short term solution is going to be adding another drive to your =46S and letting the space spill over to there. I'd like to try and reproduce here though, if it isn't too difficult to keep things in the current state? -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html