From: Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub <yehudasa@gmail.com> To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Christian Brunner <c.m.brunner@gmail.com>, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] ceph/rbd block driver for qemu-kvm (v8) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:47:34 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1291060054.1792.88.camel@yehudasa-desktop> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4CF37A23.8010202@redhat.com> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 11:02 +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 29.11.2010 09:59, schrieb Kevin Wolf: > > Am 27.11.2010 08:12, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Christian Brunner > >> <c.m.brunner@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Thanks for the review. What am I supposed to do now? > >> > >> Kevin is the block maintainer. His review is the next step, I have > >> CCed him. After that rbd would be ready to merge. > > > > If I don't find anything really obvious and it doesn't break the build, > > I'll merge it based on your review. > > Which librados version is this supposed to require? My F12 one seems to > be too old, however configure still automatically enables it (so the > build fails in the default configuration for me). I think you need to > add some check there. > > $ rpm -q ceph-devel > ceph-devel-0.20.2-1.fc12.x86_64 > > $ LANG=C make > CC block/rbd.o > block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_register_image': > block/rbd.c:191: error: 'CEPH_OSD_TMAP_SET' undeclared (first use in > this function) > block/rbd.c:191: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > block/rbd.c:191: error: for each function it appears in.) > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_set_snapc': > block/rbd.c:468: error: implicit declaration of function > 'rados_set_snap_context' > block/rbd.c:468: error: nested extern declaration of > 'rados_set_snap_context' > block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_snap_create': > block/rbd.c:844: error: implicit declaration of function > 'rados_selfmanaged_snap_create' > block/rbd.c:844: error: nested extern declaration of > 'rados_selfmanaged_snap_create' > make: *** [block/rbd.o] Error 1 > Right. The CEPH_OSD_TMAP_SET can be fixed and in theory we can get it compiled without snapshots, but we're not sure that it is really a good idea at this point. The following patch disables rbd when librados is too old. Thanks, Yehuda -- From: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@hq.newdream.net> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:38:41 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] rbd: disable rbd in configure if librados is too old This checks for the existence of the certain function and other definition. Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@hq.newdream.net> --- configure | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure b/configure index 5d8f620..18ae07c 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -1770,15 +1770,36 @@ int main(void) { rados_initialize(0, NULL); return 0; } EOF rbd_libs="-lrados -lcrypto" if compile_prog "" "$rbd_libs" ; then - rbd=yes - libs_tools="$rbd_libs $libs_tools" - libs_softmmu="$rbd_libs $libs_softmmu" + librados_too_old=no + cat > $TMPC <<EOF +#include <stdio.h> +#include <rados/librados.h> +#ifndef CEPH_OSD_TMAP_SET +#error missing CEPH_OSD_TMAP_SET +#endif +int main(void) { + int (*func)(const rados_pool_t pool, uint64_t *snapid) = rados_selfmanaged_snap_create; + rados_initialize(0, NULL); + return 0; +} +EOF + if compile_prog "" "$rbd_libs" ; then + rbd=yes + libs_tools="$rbd_libs $libs_tools" + libs_softmmu="$rbd_libs $libs_softmmu" + else + rbd=no + librados_too_old=yes + fi else if test "$rbd" = "yes" ; then feature_not_found "rados block device" fi rbd=no fi + if test "$librados_too_old" = "yes" ; then + echo "-> Your librados version is too old - upgrade needed to have rbd support" + fi fi ########################################## -- 1.5.6.5
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub <yehudasa@gmail.com> To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Cc: Christian Brunner <c.m.brunner@gmail.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] ceph/rbd block driver for qemu-kvm (v8) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:47:34 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1291060054.1792.88.camel@yehudasa-desktop> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4CF37A23.8010202@redhat.com> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 11:02 +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 29.11.2010 09:59, schrieb Kevin Wolf: > > Am 27.11.2010 08:12, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Christian Brunner > >> <c.m.brunner@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Thanks for the review. What am I supposed to do now? > >> > >> Kevin is the block maintainer. His review is the next step, I have > >> CCed him. After that rbd would be ready to merge. > > > > If I don't find anything really obvious and it doesn't break the build, > > I'll merge it based on your review. > > Which librados version is this supposed to require? My F12 one seems to > be too old, however configure still automatically enables it (so the > build fails in the default configuration for me). I think you need to > add some check there. > > $ rpm -q ceph-devel > ceph-devel-0.20.2-1.fc12.x86_64 > > $ LANG=C make > CC block/rbd.o > block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_register_image': > block/rbd.c:191: error: 'CEPH_OSD_TMAP_SET' undeclared (first use in > this function) > block/rbd.c:191: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > block/rbd.c:191: error: for each function it appears in.) > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_set_snapc': > block/rbd.c:468: error: implicit declaration of function > 'rados_set_snap_context' > block/rbd.c:468: error: nested extern declaration of > 'rados_set_snap_context' > block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_snap_create': > block/rbd.c:844: error: implicit declaration of function > 'rados_selfmanaged_snap_create' > block/rbd.c:844: error: nested extern declaration of > 'rados_selfmanaged_snap_create' > make: *** [block/rbd.o] Error 1 > Right. The CEPH_OSD_TMAP_SET can be fixed and in theory we can get it compiled without snapshots, but we're not sure that it is really a good idea at this point. The following patch disables rbd when librados is too old. Thanks, Yehuda -- From: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@hq.newdream.net> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:38:41 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] rbd: disable rbd in configure if librados is too old This checks for the existence of the certain function and other definition. Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@hq.newdream.net> --- configure | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure b/configure index 5d8f620..18ae07c 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -1770,15 +1770,36 @@ int main(void) { rados_initialize(0, NULL); return 0; } EOF rbd_libs="-lrados -lcrypto" if compile_prog "" "$rbd_libs" ; then - rbd=yes - libs_tools="$rbd_libs $libs_tools" - libs_softmmu="$rbd_libs $libs_softmmu" + librados_too_old=no + cat > $TMPC <<EOF +#include <stdio.h> +#include <rados/librados.h> +#ifndef CEPH_OSD_TMAP_SET +#error missing CEPH_OSD_TMAP_SET +#endif +int main(void) { + int (*func)(const rados_pool_t pool, uint64_t *snapid) = rados_selfmanaged_snap_create; + rados_initialize(0, NULL); + return 0; +} +EOF + if compile_prog "" "$rbd_libs" ; then + rbd=yes + libs_tools="$rbd_libs $libs_tools" + libs_softmmu="$rbd_libs $libs_softmmu" + else + rbd=no + librados_too_old=yes + fi else if test "$rbd" = "yes" ; then feature_not_found "rados block device" fi rbd=no fi + if test "$librados_too_old" = "yes" ; then + echo "-> Your librados version is too old - upgrade needed to have rbd support" + fi fi ########################################## -- 1.5.6.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 19:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-11-17 21:42 [PATCH] ceph/rbd block driver for qemu-kvm (v8) Christian Brunner 2010-11-17 21:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Christian Brunner 2010-11-18 10:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2010-11-18 10:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi 2010-11-26 21:59 ` Christian Brunner 2010-11-26 21:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " Christian Brunner 2010-11-27 7:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi 2010-11-27 7:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi 2010-11-29 8:59 ` Kevin Wolf 2010-11-29 8:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf 2010-11-29 10:02 ` Kevin Wolf 2010-11-29 19:47 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub [this message] 2010-11-29 19:47 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub 2010-12-06 12:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf 2010-12-06 12:48 ` Kevin Wolf 2010-12-06 19:22 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub 2010-12-06 19:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub 2010-12-06 20:15 ` Christian Brunner 2010-12-06 20:15 ` Christian Brunner
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1291060054.1792.88.camel@yehudasa-desktop \ --to=yehudasa@gmail.com \ --cc=c.m.brunner@gmail.com \ --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.