From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752958Ab1AVRnu (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:43:50 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:43304 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752482Ab1AVRns (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:43:48 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=UQuFHoD2CPQ248x8AXEbKhr4z9AaDqApxmEl3BhfZ64= c=1 sm=0 a=VWN6VrN-768A:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=2MpMIBKZIsVkANL4ErIA:9 a=p8_ghZNTEI3NLpM6XzbUd2a-y6gA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=LI9Vle30uBYA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] introduce __u64_aligned and U64_ALIGN() for structure alignment in custom sections (v3) From: Steven Rostedt To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, richm@oldelvet.org.uk, ben@decadent.org.uk, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, stable In-Reply-To: <20110122171134.GA31308@Krystal> References: <20110121203630.725922272@efficios.com> <20110121203642.725191236@efficios.com> <20110121.160503.233879710.davem@davemloft.net> <20110122171134.GA31308@Krystal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:43:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1295718225.12215.4822.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:11 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > After these patches get merged -- I would recommend going through the tracing > tree -- they'll have to go to -stable too. I'm therefore forwarding this to > stable@kernel.org (the same should be done for the two other patches in this > series). Hi Mathieu, I was in the process of putting them through my ktest.pl patch-check tests, but unfortunately, another bug was triggered (unrelated to these) and prevented me from getting them ready last night. I'll continue on them on Monday. -- Steve From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:43:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] introduce __u64_aligned and U64_ALIGN() for Message-Id: <1295718225.12215.4822.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> List-Id: References: <20110121203630.725922272@efficios.com> <20110121203642.725191236@efficios.com> <20110121.160503.233879710.davem@davemloft.net> <20110122171134.GA31308@Krystal> In-Reply-To: <20110122171134.GA31308@Krystal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, richm@oldelvet.org.uk, ben@decadent.org.uk, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, stable On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:11 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > After these patches get merged -- I would recommend going through the tracing > tree -- they'll have to go to -stable too. I'm therefore forwarding this to > stable@kernel.org (the same should be done for the two other patches in this > series). Hi Mathieu, I was in the process of putting them through my ktest.pl patch-check tests, but unfortunately, another bug was triggered (unrelated to these) and prevented me from getting them ready last night. I'll continue on them on Monday. -- Steve