From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hirosh.dabui@snom.com (Hirosh Dabui) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:56:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] This patch fix a bug in the register indexing for GPIOs numbers > 31 Message-ID: <1295945785-7393-1-git-send-email-hirosh.dabui@snom.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org to get the relevant hardware registers of tnetv107x to control the GPIOs. In the structure tnetv107x_gpio_regs: struct tnetv107x_gpio_regs { u32 idver; u32 data_in[3]; u32 data_out[3]; u32 direction[3]; u32 enable[3]; }; The GPIO hardware register addresses of tnetv107x are stored. The chip implements 3 registers of each entity to serve 96 GPIOs, each register provides a subset of 32 GPIOs. The driver provides these macros: gpio_reg_set_bit, gpio_reg_get_bit and gpio_reg_clear_bit. The bug implied the use of macros to access the relevant hardware register e.g. the driver code used the macro like this: 'gpio_reg_clear_bit(®->data_out, gpio)' But it has to be used like this: 'gpio_reg_clear_bit(reg->data_out, gpio)'. The different results are shown here: - ®->data_out + 1 (it will add the full array size of data_out i.e. 12 bytes) - reg->data_out + 1 (it will increment only the size of data_out i.e. only 4 bytes) Acked-by: Cyril Chemparathy Signed-off-by: Hirosh Dabui --- arch/arm/mach-davinci/gpio-tnetv107x.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/gpio-tnetv107x.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/gpio-tnetv107x.c index d102986..3fa3e28 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/gpio-tnetv107x.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/gpio-tnetv107x.c @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int tnetv107x_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags); - gpio_reg_set_bit(®s->enable, gpio); + gpio_reg_set_bit(regs->enable, gpio); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags); @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void tnetv107x_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags); - gpio_reg_clear_bit(®s->enable, gpio); + gpio_reg_clear_bit(regs->enable, gpio); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags); } @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int tnetv107x_gpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags); - gpio_reg_set_bit(®s->direction, gpio); + gpio_reg_set_bit(regs->direction, gpio); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags); @@ -106,11 +106,11 @@ static int tnetv107x_gpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *chip, spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags); if (value) - gpio_reg_set_bit(®s->data_out, gpio); + gpio_reg_set_bit(regs->data_out, gpio); else - gpio_reg_clear_bit(®s->data_out, gpio); + gpio_reg_clear_bit(regs->data_out, gpio); - gpio_reg_clear_bit(®s->direction, gpio); + gpio_reg_clear_bit(regs->direction, gpio); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags); @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int tnetv107x_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) unsigned gpio = chip->base + offset; int ret; - ret = gpio_reg_get_bit(®s->data_in, gpio); + ret = gpio_reg_get_bit(regs->data_in, gpio); return ret ? 1 : 0; } @@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ static void tnetv107x_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags); if (value) - gpio_reg_set_bit(®s->data_out, gpio); + gpio_reg_set_bit(regs->data_out, gpio); else - gpio_reg_clear_bit(®s->data_out, gpio); + gpio_reg_clear_bit(regs->data_out, gpio); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags); } -- 1.7.1