From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3668922604964270691==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [RFCv2] doc: Proposal for LTE/IMS API Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:39:18 -0800 Message-ID: <1297719558.2519.1.camel@aeonflux> In-Reply-To: List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============3668922604964270691== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, > >> In theory there might be more than one IMS APN for a operator, > = > >> but I really don't see this as a real life scenario for this. > = > >> If anyone disagrees please speak out and explain... > = > = > = > One such scenario is the in-vehicle use model, where the ISP provides > network connectivity via one APN and the auto manufacturer has network > connectivity through a separate, private, and independent APN. > Connectivity, billing, bandwidth, reliability, roaming etc are all > independent for each network. For example, auto manufacturer X may > contract with ISP Y for remote access to the car, while the owner of > the car may prefer ISP Z for personal use. and this case actually has two fully independent radio modules. One for the consumer and one for the car manufacturer. And the car manufacturer GSM/UMTS hardware has normally a builtin SIM card that can not be removed. For obvious reasons of misuse. Regards Marcel --===============3668922604964270691==--