From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PwYoS-0000lj-65 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:41:21 +0000 Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so3689440wwj.18 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:41:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] UBIFS: fix recovery on CFI NOR From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Anatolij Gustschin In-Reply-To: <1296998270-19853-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> References: <1296998270-19853-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:39:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1299497990.2746.31.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Holger Brunck , Norbert van Bolhuis , Adrian Hunter Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:17 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Hi, > > here is a better patch for recovery fix. Comparing to the previous > patch-set now we make sure we keep write-buffer offset aligned to > @c->max_write_size (64 in case of CFI NOR) as much as possible. > > Also, I've merged the "Add comments" patch with the patch which adds > the code. > > You can find these patches also in the UBIFS git tree, 'cfi-nor-fix-v2' > branch: > git://git.infradead.org/ubifs-2.6.git cfi-nor-fix-v2 > > Please, test. These patches may break NAND setups as well, so anyone > who is interested in having stable UBIFS in the next release, please, > also test. Anatolij, did these patches fix your issues. I know you found another one related to unstable bits, but it is a separate issue. I need to make a decision whether my patches go upstream the next merge window or they should wait. I have v3 of the patches, but they are not very different from v2. I will send them out as well. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)