All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bert Kenward <bkenward@solarflare.com>
To: Dave Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] sfc: avoid hang from nested use of the filter_sem
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:44:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12aa44a4-8d1d-15b4-476a-e3cbabd1369b@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ffa1a8d2-7906-29f9-6089-f968aa376681@solarflare.com>

In some situations we may end up calling down_read while already
holding the semaphore for write, thus hanging. This has been seen
when setting the MAC address for the interface. The hung task log
in this situation includes this stack:
  down_read
  efx_ef10_filter_insert
  efx_ef10_filter_insert_addr_list
  efx_ef10_filter_vlan_sync_rx_mode
  efx_ef10_filter_add_vlan
  efx_ef10_filter_table_probe
  efx_ef10_set_mac_address
  efx_set_mac_address
  dev_set_mac_address

In addition, lockdep rightly points out that nested calling of
down_read is incorrect.

Fixes: c2bebe37c6b6 ("sfc: give ef10 its own rwsem in the filter table instead of filter_lock")
Tested-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bert Kenward <bkenward@solarflare.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
index 23f0785c0573..7eeac3d6cfe8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
@@ -4288,9 +4288,9 @@ static int efx_ef10_filter_pri(struct efx_ef10_filter_table *table,
 	return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
 }
 
-static s32 efx_ef10_filter_insert(struct efx_nic *efx,
-				  struct efx_filter_spec *spec,
-				  bool replace_equal)
+static s32 efx_ef10_filter_insert_locked(struct efx_nic *efx,
+					 struct efx_filter_spec *spec,
+					 bool replace_equal)
 {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(mc_rem_map, EFX_EF10_FILTER_SEARCH_LIMIT);
 	struct efx_ef10_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
@@ -4307,7 +4307,7 @@ static s32 efx_ef10_filter_insert(struct efx_nic *efx,
 	bool is_mc_recip;
 	s32 rc;
 
-	down_read(&efx->filter_sem);
+	WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&efx->filter_sem));
 	table = efx->filter_state;
 	down_write(&table->lock);
 
@@ -4498,10 +4498,22 @@ static s32 efx_ef10_filter_insert(struct efx_nic *efx,
 	if (rss_locked)
 		mutex_unlock(&efx->rss_lock);
 	up_write(&table->lock);
-	up_read(&efx->filter_sem);
 	return rc;
 }
 
+static s32 efx_ef10_filter_insert(struct efx_nic *efx,
+				  struct efx_filter_spec *spec,
+				  bool replace_equal)
+{
+	s32 ret;
+
+	down_read(&efx->filter_sem);
+	ret = efx_ef10_filter_insert_locked(efx, spec, replace_equal);
+	up_read(&efx->filter_sem);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static void efx_ef10_filter_update_rx_scatter(struct efx_nic *efx)
 {
 	/* no need to do anything here on EF10 */
@@ -5285,7 +5297,7 @@ static int efx_ef10_filter_insert_addr_list(struct efx_nic *efx,
 		EFX_WARN_ON_PARANOID(ids[i] != EFX_EF10_FILTER_ID_INVALID);
 		efx_filter_init_rx(&spec, EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO, filter_flags, 0);
 		efx_filter_set_eth_local(&spec, vlan->vid, addr_list[i].addr);
-		rc = efx_ef10_filter_insert(efx, &spec, true);
+		rc = efx_ef10_filter_insert_locked(efx, &spec, true);
 		if (rc < 0) {
 			if (rollback) {
 				netif_info(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
@@ -5314,7 +5326,7 @@ static int efx_ef10_filter_insert_addr_list(struct efx_nic *efx,
 		efx_filter_init_rx(&spec, EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO, filter_flags, 0);
 		eth_broadcast_addr(baddr);
 		efx_filter_set_eth_local(&spec, vlan->vid, baddr);
-		rc = efx_ef10_filter_insert(efx, &spec, true);
+		rc = efx_ef10_filter_insert_locked(efx, &spec, true);
 		if (rc < 0) {
 			netif_warn(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
 				   "Broadcast filter insert failed rc=%d\n", rc);
@@ -5370,7 +5382,7 @@ static int efx_ef10_filter_insert_def(struct efx_nic *efx,
 	if (vlan->vid != EFX_FILTER_VID_UNSPEC)
 		efx_filter_set_eth_local(&spec, vlan->vid, NULL);
 
-	rc = efx_ef10_filter_insert(efx, &spec, true);
+	rc = efx_ef10_filter_insert_locked(efx, &spec, true);
 	if (rc < 0) {
 		const char *um = multicast ? "Multicast" : "Unicast";
 		const char *encap_name = "";
@@ -5430,7 +5442,7 @@ static int efx_ef10_filter_insert_def(struct efx_nic *efx,
 					   filter_flags, 0);
 			eth_broadcast_addr(baddr);
 			efx_filter_set_eth_local(&spec, vlan->vid, baddr);
-			rc = efx_ef10_filter_insert(efx, &spec, true);
+			rc = efx_ef10_filter_insert_locked(efx, &spec, true);
 			if (rc < 0) {
 				netif_warn(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
 					   "Broadcast filter insert failed rc=%d\n",
-- 
2.13.6

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-11 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-11 10:39 [PATCH net 0/2] sfc: filter locking fixes Bert Kenward
2018-07-11 10:44 ` Bert Kenward [this message]
2018-07-11 10:45 ` [PATCH net 2/2] sfc: hold filter_sem consistently during reset Bert Kenward
2018-07-12 21:52 ` [PATCH net 0/2] sfc: filter locking fixes David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12aa44a4-8d1d-15b4-476a-e3cbabd1369b@solarflare.com \
    --to=bkenward@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.