From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Bernhard M. Wiedemann" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Do not insert timestamps in efi files Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:11:28 +0200 Message-ID: <12e17c52-f1cf-10e9-7d00-e34fb54e6cd5@suse.de> References: <7a88f5cb-8f0a-9974-8e84-990045cb8726@suse.de> <20181024134522.3295-1-bwiedemann@suse.de> <108D0A7C020000E4CA4B4E14@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> <74F2501302000079CA4B4E14@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> <5BD1B8AA02000078001F4A44@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> <5BD1CE4802000078001F4AF7@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2097616512558394129==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5BD1CE4802000078001F4AF7@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Jan Beulich , Andrew Cooper Cc: Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --===============2097616512558394129== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Wts8Y2ay3BGkkKTjA76GUZzHMjSCw2bJC" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Wts8Y2ay3BGkkKTjA76GUZzHMjSCw2bJC Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="XLKlgajG0r87E4bhRxBQjc0lz0OcrJMme"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Bernhard M. Wiedemann" To: Jan Beulich , Andrew Cooper Cc: Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Message-ID: <12e17c52-f1cf-10e9-7d00-e34fb54e6cd5@suse.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Do not insert timestamps in efi files References: <7a88f5cb-8f0a-9974-8e84-990045cb8726@suse.de> <20181024134522.3295-1-bwiedemann@suse.de> <108D0A7C020000E4CA4B4E14@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> <74F2501302000079CA4B4E14@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> <5BD1B8AA02000078001F4A44@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> <5BD1CE4802000078001F4AF7@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> In-Reply-To: <5BD1CE4802000078001F4AF7@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> --XLKlgajG0r87E4bhRxBQjc0lz0OcrJMme Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 25/10/2018 16.08, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 25.10.18 at 16:00, wrote: >> For shipped binaries to customers, exactly when it was built is >> irrelevant, whereas peoples ability to independently verify the >> integrity of the binary is important. >=20 > Correct, which is why I appreciate the _option_ of zapping the > timestamp. Adding an option for this, would make the (already somewhat ugly) patch even more ugly, so I thought, that fixing it in binutils might be the better way, because other projects will also want to create reproducible PE binaries and we do not want to add such ugly patches to all of them. =3D> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-10/msg00279.html Let's see what they say. Ciao Bernhard M. --XLKlgajG0r87E4bhRxBQjc0lz0OcrJMme-- --Wts8Y2ay3BGkkKTjA76GUZzHMjSCw2bJC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ iF0EARECAB0WIQRk4KvQEtfG32NHprVJNgs7HfuhZAUCW9L2ZAAKCRBJNgs7Hfuh ZD2kAKC6FtzOUhQlJfCRcO4HWnfxlwgc9wCdF3sN/CIJS46Pg854ILEnAWEqGd0= =4V6p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Wts8Y2ay3BGkkKTjA76GUZzHMjSCw2bJC-- --===============2097616512558394129== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVucHJvamVjdC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0 cy54ZW5wcm9qZWN0Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3hlbi1kZXZlbA== --===============2097616512558394129==--