From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QIFW4-0003zE-Fd for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:32:00 +0200 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.3]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QIFP0-0002qc-51 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:24:42 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <1304653677-2982-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> References: <1304653677-2982-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 08:29:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1304666954.3162.3.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] conf/layer.conf: Use .= for BBPATH and += for BBFILES X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 07:32:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 20:47 -0700, raj.khem@gmail.com wrote: > # We have a conf and classes directory, prepend to BBPATH to prefer our versions > -BBPATH := "${LAYERDIR}:${BBPATH}" > +BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" This patch seems to cause the code to do the opposite of what the comment says. If changing it to be an append rather than a prepend is deliberate, please adjust the comment to match. (It would also be nice to have some commentary in the commit message explaining why this is being done, since it isn't obvious to me why append would be better.) p.