From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753670Ab1EIIn7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 04:43:59 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:15452 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752813Ab1EIIn6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2011 04:43:58 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,339,1301900400"; d="scan'208";a="639981970" Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf events, x86: Implement Sandybridge last-level cache events From: Lin Ming To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel , Mike Galbraith , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt In-Reply-To: <1304689667.2200.3.camel@localhost> References: <1304666042-17577-1-git-send-email-ming.m.lin@intel.com> <20110506073832.GG23166@elte.hu> <20110506091950.GA5081@elte.hu> <1304689667.2200.3.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 16:45:11 +0800 Message-ID: <1304930711.3924.306.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 21:47 +0800, Lin Ming wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 17:19 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Btw., there's another missing Intel SandyBridge related perf events feature as > > well which was not implemented with the Intel offcore bits. > > > > Peter did a raw first cut - entirely untested, see it below. Would you be > > interested in testing it on Intel SandyBridge hw and sending (the working > > version) to lkml with your Signed-off-by if the events looks good to you in > > some real tests (i.e. are counting real LL cache events)? > > OK, but I can't access SandyBridge machine at home now. > Will try it next Monday. The updated and tested patch at: http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/9/80 Please help to review the definitions for SNB_L3_HIT/_MISS_/ACCESS. I'm really unsure for that. Thanks, Lin Ming > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ingo >