All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, sandeen@redhat.com, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ext4: fix init_itable=n to work as expected for n=0
Date: Mon,  9 May 2011 17:57:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304956630-20384-3-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304956630-20384-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com>

For some reason, when we set mount option init_itable=0 it behaves as
we would set init_itable=20 which is not right at all. Basically when we
set it to zero we are saying to lazyinit thread not to wait between
zeroing the inode table (except of cond_resched()) so this commit fixes
that and removes the unnecessary condition. The 'n' should be also
properly used on remount.

When the n is not set at all, it means that the default miltiplier
EXT4_DEF_LI_WAIT_MULT is set instead.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c |   21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 6ccf0e2..c379af6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -2690,11 +2690,8 @@ static int ext4_run_li_request(struct ext4_li_request *elr)
 		ret = ext4_init_inode_table(sb, group,
 					    elr->lr_timeout ? 0 : 1);
 		if (elr->lr_timeout == 0) {
-			timeout = jiffies - timeout;
-			if (elr->lr_sbi->s_li_wait_mult)
-				timeout *= elr->lr_sbi->s_li_wait_mult;
-			else
-				timeout *= 20;
+			timeout = (jiffies - timeout) *
+				  elr->lr_sbi->s_li_wait_mult;
 			elr->lr_timeout = timeout;
 		}
 		elr->lr_next_sched = jiffies + elr->lr_timeout;
@@ -2931,8 +2928,14 @@ static int ext4_register_li_request(struct super_block *sb,
 	ext4_group_t ngroups = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_groups_count;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (sbi->s_li_request != NULL)
+	if (sbi->s_li_request != NULL) {
+		/*
+		 * Reset timeout so it can be computed again, because
+		 * s_li_wait_mult might have changed.
+		 */
+		sbi->s_li_request->lr_timeout = 0;
 		return 0;
+	}
 
 	if (first_not_zeroed == ngroups ||
 	    (sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) ||
@@ -3137,6 +3140,12 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 	    ((def_mount_opts & EXT4_DEFM_NODELALLOC) == 0))
 		set_opt(sb, DELALLOC);
 
+	/*
+	 * set default s_li_wait_mult for lazyinit, for the case there is
+	 * no mount option specified.
+	 */
+	sbi->s_li_wait_mult = EXT4_DEF_LI_WAIT_MULT;
+
 	if (!parse_options((char *) sbi->s_es->s_mount_opts, sb,
 			   &journal_devnum, &journal_ioprio, NULL, 0)) {
 		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING,
-- 
1.7.4.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-09 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-09 15:57 [PATCH 1/4 v2] ext4: Use schedule_timeout_interruptible() for waiting in lazyinit thread Lukas Czerner
2011-05-09 15:57 ` [PATCH 2/4 v2] ext4: Remove unnecessary wait_event ext4_run_lazyinit_thread() Lukas Czerner
2011-05-19 19:37   ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-20  9:09     ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-09 15:57 ` Lukas Czerner [this message]
2011-05-19 19:59   ` [PATCH 3/4] ext4: fix init_itable=n to work as expected for n=0 Eric Sandeen
2011-05-20  9:21     ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-09 15:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free ext4_remove_li_request() Lukas Czerner
2011-05-19 20:05   ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-20  9:27     ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-20 16:03       ` Ted Ts'o
2011-05-20 16:12         ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-20 17:47           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-05-20 17:49             ` Eric Sandeen
2011-05-20 16:16         ` Lukas Czerner
2011-05-20 17:39           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-05-20 17:42             ` Ted Ts'o
2011-05-19 19:30 ` [PATCH 1/4 v2] ext4: Use schedule_timeout_interruptible() for waiting in lazyinit thread Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1304956630-20384-3-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com \
    --to=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.