From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756736Ab1ESIcf (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2011 04:32:35 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:45789 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752653Ab1ESIcd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2011 04:32:33 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Split up buffer handling from core code From: Peter Zijlstra To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Stephane Eranian In-Reply-To: <20110519073136.GB14049@liondog.tnic> References: <1305767185-5771-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20110519073136.GB14049@liondog.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:32:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1305793931.2466.7191.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:31 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Ok, maybe I'm missing something looking at this from the side but > perf_output_copy is used only internally by perf_event.c, i.e. > events/core.c, why not put it into the internal.h header? Not strictly true, but since the current inline is only valid for the existing perf_event.c its close enough :-) Anyway, I agree, stick it in internal.h :-)