From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QN1be-0005cm-NW for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:41:30 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4JBcZ3t007475 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:38:35 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07401-02 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:38:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4JBcR4e007468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:38:27 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <53BCC7D4-31CB-43AA-A5DD-CC1730DDD0B2@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <53BCC7D4-31CB-43AA-A5DD-CC1730DDD0B2@dominion.thruhere.net> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:38:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1305805104.3424.484.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:41:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:54 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 19 mei 2011, om 12:29 heeft Lianhao Lu het volgende geschreven: > > > From: Lianhao Lu > > > > This series of 5 patches implemented the network based PR service and enabled > > the poky to use it during the task do_package and do_package_write_xxx. By > > using the network based PR service and the basichash for BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER, > > the poky user may not need to bump the PR manually everytime he/she changes > > the recipe. The package will get automatically rebuilt and new revision number > > reflecting the change will be included in the package feed. > > Does it have a public/private mode? In the angstrom case, we only want > developers to 'submit' PR bumps and users only retrieve them. It doesn't look like it but it wouldn't be hard to only submit PR changes if some kind of token was present. The big question would be, if a user tried building something for which PR no record was on the server and didn't have submit privileges, what should the server return and how should the build behave? Hard error? If its not a hard error, you are likely to run into local reproducibility issues and also conflicts with the server? Cheers, Richard