From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932139Ab1EWQWN (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 12:22:13 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:33312 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932098Ab1EWQWL (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 12:22:11 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=y6zMVzRGPZqd+EkIbWgKRW0ZY5+85Abqc3bXR1aXymM= c=1 sm=0 a=73qD3fekirQA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=IJv9LcIfAAAA:8 a=yrH4GF8zMui5lNqqEk0A:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=K6kUPx8HyhEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [patch v2] checkpatch: Signature format verification From: Steven Rostedt To: Joe Perches Cc: anish singh , davej@redhat.com, apw@shadowen.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, vapier@gentoo.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, man.k1983@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <1306124078.1681.10.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <1306006721.1622.18.camel@anish-desktop> <1306059528.2761.3.camel@anish-desktop> <1306073772.1681.6.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1306124078.1681.10.camel@Joe-Laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 12:22:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1306167729.1465.39.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 21:14 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 08:26 +0530, anish singh wrote: > > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 15:48 +0530, anish wrote: > > > This patch generates warning when there is no space between > > > the patch submitter and successive mail-id. > > [] > > What does this mean?I checked in kernelnewbies archives and asked > > on IRC channel but couldn't get the meaning.Kindly let me know. > > It means I didn't quote all of your original message. > Of course, we usually do "[...]" or "[..]". Without the dots, it just looks like some kind of uninitialized array. -- Steve