From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932098Ab1EYBAb (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 21:00:31 -0400 Received: from mail.linux-iscsi.org ([67.23.28.174]:45136 "EHLO linux-iscsi.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752011Ab1EYBAa (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 21:00:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] target: Convert REPORT_LUNs to use int_to_scsilun From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-kernel , linux-scsi , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , FUJITA Tomonori , Andy Grover , Mike Christie , Boaz Harrosh , Andrew Morton , Martin Svec In-Reply-To: <1306256577.10201.13.camel@mulgrave.site> References: <1305861554-29960-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <1305861554-29960-6-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <1306256577.10201.13.camel@mulgrave.site> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:52:12 -0700 Message-Id: <1306284732.29724.167.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 13:02 -0400, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:19 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > From: Nicholas Bellinger > > > > This patch converts transport_core_report_lun_response() to use > > drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c:int_to_scsilun instead of using the > > struct target_core_fabric_ops->pack_lun() fabric provided API vector. > > > > It also removes the tfo->pack_lun check from target_fabric_tf_ops_check() > > and removes from struct target_core_fabric_ops->pack_lun() from > > target_core_fabric_ops.h, and the following mainline scsi-misc fabric > > modules: > > > > *) tcm_loop: Drop tcm_loop_pack_lun() usage > > *) tcm_fc: Drop ft_pack_lun() usage > > > > Reported-by: Mike Christie > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger > > There's no way this or the following patch count as bug fixes. They're > converging hand rolled functions and definitions (which is good, but not > a bug fix). > Correct, patches # 1 -> 4 where the bugfixes patches of this series that needed to go to also go into stable, but the remaining two patches requested by Mike and Christoph during iscsi-target review are >= .40 only material. Thank you! --nab