From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QRWV7-00067V-VX for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:29:22 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4VLQ6WA021503; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:26:06 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18425-08; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:26:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4VLPuYp021489 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 31 May 2011 22:25:57 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <4DE546AE.1090301@intel.com> References: <79A1BC44-8268-4177-BBC5-4A5B08BDC8B7@dominion.thruhere.net> <4DE53C21.7020000@linux.intel.com> <4DE546AE.1090301@intel.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:25:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1306877140.27470.378.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Koen Kooi , "poky@yoctoproject.org Project" Subject: Re: [poky] [PATCH 0/7] User/group creation at preinstall X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:29:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:51 -0700, Scott Garman wrote: > On 05/31/2011 12:06 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > > On 05/31/2011 11:45 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Shouldn't patches like this be sent to the oe-core list? It wouldn't > >> have saved me from the selinux bug in shadow, though :) > >> > > Scott, > > > > I would agree with Koen, this is a oe-core change, not a Poky only > > change, please resend this request to the oe-core list. > > Sure, I'll resend it to oe-core. > > That said, I have no idea what criteria should be used to determine > which list to send things to, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Is this > documented anywhere? We're trying to make this simpler over time: bitbake changes -> bitbake-devel Any code in oe-core -> oe-core list Anything in poky not in oe-core/bitbake -> poky list Cheers, Richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75804C800FB for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:26:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4VLQ6WA021503; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:26:06 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18425-08; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:26:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4VLPuYp021489 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 31 May 2011 22:25:57 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <4DE546AE.1090301@intel.com> References: <79A1BC44-8268-4177-BBC5-4A5B08BDC8B7@dominion.thruhere.net> <4DE53C21.7020000@linux.intel.com> <4DE546AE.1090301@intel.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:25:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1306877140.27470.378.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: "poky@yoctoproject.org Project" Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/7] User/group creation at preinstall X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:26:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:51 -0700, Scott Garman wrote: > On 05/31/2011 12:06 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > > On 05/31/2011 11:45 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Shouldn't patches like this be sent to the oe-core list? It wouldn't > >> have saved me from the selinux bug in shadow, though :) > >> > > Scott, > > > > I would agree with Koen, this is a oe-core change, not a Poky only > > change, please resend this request to the oe-core list. > > Sure, I'll resend it to oe-core. > > That said, I have no idea what criteria should be used to determine > which list to send things to, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Is this > documented anywhere? We're trying to make this simpler over time: bitbake changes -> bitbake-devel Any code in oe-core -> oe-core list Anything in poky not in oe-core/bitbake -> poky list Cheers, Richard