From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QRWuH-0006Wy-LU for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 23:55:21 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4VLqD9o021780 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:52:13 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 21614-03 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:52:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4VLq8Xx021774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 22:52:08 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <4DE55D5B.6070307@intel.com> References: <79A1BC44-8268-4177-BBC5-4A5B08BDC8B7@dominion.thruhere.net> <4DE53C21.7020000@linux.intel.com> <4DE546AE.1090301@intel.com> <4DE55A95.2090302@windriver.com> <4DE55D5B.6070307@intel.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:51:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1306878712.27470.380.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [poky] [PATCH 0/7] User/group creation at preinstall X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:55:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 14:27 -0700, Scott Garman wrote: > So presumably this would mean: if it's about a recipe that is not in > OE-core, it's Poky-specific? If its not bitbake and its not on OE-Core its poky specific. > Which would also mean that discussion about anything in the bitbake > classes belongs on OE-core as well, yes? Correct. Cheers, Richard