All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf, x86: Add Intel Nehalem/Westmere uncore pmu
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:05:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309500301.24590.116.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309442903.12449.55.camel@twins>

On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 22:08 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 08:09 +0000, Lin Ming wrote:
> > +static struct pmu uncore_pmu = {
> 
> 	.task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context,

OK.

usage: perf stat [<options>] [<command>]

Currently, "perf stat" always need a <command> to do counting.
Need to change it to be optional.

So I may add a "P" option to specify which physical processor to count.

perf stat -P 3 -e uncore:rXXXX

> 
> > +       .event_init     = uncore_pmu_event_init,
> > +       .add            = uncore_pmu_add,
> > +       .del            = uncore_pmu_del,
> > +       .start          = uncore_pmu_start,
> > +       .stop           = uncore_pmu_stop,
> > +       .read           = uncore_pmu_read,
> > +}; 
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-01  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-30  8:09 [PATCH 0/4] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support Lin Ming
2011-06-30  8:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf, x86: Add Intel Nehalem/Westmere uncore pmu Lin Ming
2011-06-30 14:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-01  6:05     ` Lin Ming [this message]
2011-06-30 16:58   ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-04  6:39     ` Lin Ming
2011-07-04  8:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-04 21:57       ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-05 11:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-05 12:48           ` Lin Ming
2011-07-05 12:56             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-05 13:13               ` Lin Ming
2011-07-05 16:01           ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-06  9:35             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-30  8:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf, x86: Add Intel SandyBridge " Lin Ming
2011-06-30 22:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-30  8:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: Remove perf_event_attr::type check Lin Ming
2011-07-21 19:31   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Lin Ming
2011-06-30  8:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf tool: Get PMU type id from sysfs Lin Ming
2011-06-30 12:10 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support Stephane Eranian
2011-06-30 14:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-30 16:27   ` Stephane Eranian
2011-07-01  3:17     ` Lin Ming
2011-07-01 10:49       ` Stephane Eranian
2011-07-01 12:23         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-07-01 12:28           ` Stephane Eranian
2011-07-04  6:03         ` Lin Ming
2011-07-01  5:49   ` Lin Ming
2011-07-01 11:08 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1309500301.24590.116.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com \
    --to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.