All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3
Date: Fri,  1 Jul 2011 12:21:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309548086-28215-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> (raw)

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

I got a request to make it easier to determine the microcode update level
on Intel CPUs. This patch adds a new "microcode" field to /proc/cpuinfo.

The microcode level is also outputed on fatal machine checks together
with the other CPUID model information.

I removed the respective code from the microcode update driver, it
just reads the field from cpu_data. Also when the microcode is updated
it fills in the new values too.

I had to add a memory barrier to native_cpuid to prevent it being
optimized away when the result is not used.

This turns out to clean up further code which already got this
information manually. This is done in followon patches.

v2:  Lots of updates based on feedback.
v3:  Rename cpu_update to microcode. Misc changes from feedback.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h  |    4 +++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c       |   13 +++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c  |    9 +++++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c        |    3 ++-
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c |   14 +++++---------
 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 2193715..9ded5bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
 	/* Index into per_cpu list: */
 	u16			cpu_index;
 #endif
+	u32			microcode;
 } __attribute__((__aligned__(SMP_CACHE_BYTES)));
 
 #define X86_VENDOR_INTEL	0
@@ -179,7 +180,8 @@ static inline void native_cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx,
 	      "=b" (*ebx),
 	      "=c" (*ecx),
 	      "=d" (*edx)
-	    : "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx));
+	    : "0" (*eax), "2" (*ecx)
+	    : "memory");
 }
 
 static inline void load_cr3(pgd_t *pgdir)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 1edf5ba..ebedd27 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -364,6 +364,19 @@ static void __cpuinit init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 
 	early_init_intel(c);
 
+	if (c->x86 >= 6 && !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IA64)) {
+		unsigned lower_word;
+
+		wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
+		/* The CPUID 1 fills in the MSR as documented in the SDM */
+		/*
+		 * Wrong comment from microcode_intel.c:
+		 * see notes above for revision 1.07.  Apparent chip bug
+		 */
+		cpuid_eax(1);
+		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, lower_word, c->microcode);
+	}
+
 	intel_workarounds(c);
 
 	/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index ff1ae9b..82eb8be 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -220,8 +220,13 @@ static void print_mce(struct mce *m)
 		pr_cont("MISC %llx ", m->misc);
 
 	pr_cont("\n");
-	pr_emerg(HW_ERR "PROCESSOR %u:%x TIME %llu SOCKET %u APIC %x\n",
-		m->cpuvendor, m->cpuid, m->time, m->socketid, m->apicid);
+	/* 
+ 	 * Note this output is parsed by external tools and old fields
+ 	 * should not be changed.
+ 	 */
+	pr_emerg(HW_ERR "PROCESSOR %u:%x TIME %llu SOCKET %u APIC %x microcode %u\n",
+		m->cpuvendor, m->cpuid, m->time, m->socketid, m->apicid,
+		cpu_data(m->extcpu).microcode);
 
 	/*
 	 * Print out human-readable details about the MCE error,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index 62ac8cb..48ac015 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		seq_printf(m, "stepping\t: %d\n", c->x86_mask);
 	else
 		seq_printf(m, "stepping\t: unknown\n");
+	if (c->microcode)
+		seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: %u\n", c->microcode);
 
 	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
 		unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
@@ -132,7 +134,6 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 				seq_printf(m, " [%d]", i);
 		}
 	}
-
 	seq_printf(m, "\n\n");
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
index 1a1b606..3ca42d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
@@ -161,12 +161,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
 		csig->pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
 	}
 
-	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
-	/* see notes above for revision 1.07.  Apparent chip bug */
-	sync_core();
-	/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], csig->rev);
-
+	csig->rev = c->microcode;
 	pr_info("CPU%d sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
 		cpu_num, csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
 
@@ -299,9 +294,9 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
 	struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
 	unsigned int val[2];
-	int cpu_num;
+	int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
+	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
 
-	cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
 	uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
 	mc_intel = uci->mc;
 
@@ -317,7 +312,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
 	      (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits >> 16 >> 16);
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
 
-	/* see notes above for revision 1.07.  Apparent chip bug */
+	/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
 	sync_core();
 
 	/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
@@ -335,6 +330,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
 		(mc_intel->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
 
 	uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
+	c->microcode = val[1];
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.4.4


             reply	other threads:[~2011-07-01 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-01 19:21 Andi Kleen [this message]
2011-07-01 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-07-01 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-07-06 23:57 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-07 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1309548086-28215-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.