From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] MTD: pxa3xx_nand: enable multiple chip select support From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Lei Wen Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:07:09 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <1309319494-17951-1-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <1309771536-10597-4-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <1309935216.3149.72.camel@sauron> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1309936038.3149.82.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Eric Miao , David Woodhouse , Lei Wen , Haojian Zhuang , Daniel Mack , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Igor Grinberg , linux-arm-kernel Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 14:54 +0800, Lei Wen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > The problem is that in this patch you change struct pxa3xx_nand_platform_data, > > and in the next patch you amend the platform data declarations, which means that > > the kernel will not compile between patches 3 and 4... > > So... how about merge the patch 3 and 4 together? IMO this should be OK. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dedekind1@gmail.com (Artem Bityutskiy) Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:07:09 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] MTD: pxa3xx_nand: enable multiple chip select support In-Reply-To: References: <1309319494-17951-1-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <1309771536-10597-4-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <1309935216.3149.72.camel@sauron> Message-ID: <1309936038.3149.82.camel@sauron> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 14:54 +0800, Lei Wen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > The problem is that in this patch you change struct pxa3xx_nand_platform_data, > > and in the next patch you amend the platform data declarations, which means that > > the kernel will not compile between patches 3 and 4... > > So... how about merge the patch 3 and 4 together? IMO this should be OK. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy