All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Stephane Chazelas <stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr>
Cc: cwillu <cwillu@cwillu.com>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Memory leak?
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:15:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310141349-sup-9515@shiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110708154123.GA17886@yahoo.fr>

Excerpts from Stephane Chazelas's message of 2011-07-08 11:41:23 -0400:
> 2011-07-08 11:06:08 -0400, Chris Mason:
> [...]
> > So the invalidate opcode in btrfs-fixup-0 is the big problem.  We're
> > either failing to write because we weren't able to allocate memory (and
> > not dealing with it properly) or there is a bigger problem.
> > 
> > Does the btrfs-fixup-0 oops come before or after the ooms?
> 
> Hi Chris, thanks for looking into this.
> 
> It comes long before. Hours before there's any problem. So it
> seems unrelated.

It could be the cause of the problem.  We're calling BUG() with the page
locked, which means that page will never ever be freed, and since this
worker thread is gone, it could be messing up various parts of the
reclaim code.

But, this worker thread isn't supposed to get called very often...it's
really catching a corner of a corner of a strange race.  So we do need
to get a better understanding of why and how often.

You described this workload as rsync, is there anything else running?

I'd definitely try without -o compress_force.

-chris

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-08 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-03 19:09 Memory leak? Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-03 19:38 ` cwillu
2011-07-06  8:11   ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-07  8:09     ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-07  8:20       ` Li Zefan
2011-07-07  8:37         ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 12:44     ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 15:06       ` Chris Mason
2011-07-08 15:41         ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 16:11           ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 16:17             ` Chris Mason
2011-07-08 16:57               ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09 17:11               ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 16:15           ` Chris Mason [this message]
2011-07-08 17:06             ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 20:04             ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-08 20:12               ` Chris Mason
2011-07-09  7:09                 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09  7:42                   ` A lot of writing to FS only read (Was: Memory leak?) Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-10  5:58                   ` Memory leak? Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09 17:09         ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-09 19:25           ` cwillu
2011-07-09 20:36             ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-10 12:44               ` Chris Mason
2011-07-10 18:37                 ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-11  9:01                   ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-11 15:00                     ` Chris Mason
2011-07-11 15:35                       ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-11 16:25                         ` Chris Mason
2011-07-11 16:34                           ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-12 11:40                     ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-16 12:12                     ` write(2) taking 4s. (Was: Memory leak?) Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-16 16:22                       ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-17  9:17                       ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-18 10:39                         ` write(2) taking 4s Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-18 19:37                           ` Stephane Chazelas
2011-07-19  9:32                             ` Stephane Chazelas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-10 12:57 memory leak ? Pankaj Pandey
2015-08-10 13:04 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2011-01-21 12:39 Memory leak? Damnshock
2011-01-21 12:52 ` Chris Wilson
2011-01-21 14:22   ` Damnshock
2008-02-07 11:44 memory leak? Gergely Gábor
2003-11-04 17:01 Memory leak? Daniel Chemko
     [not found] <20031103142830.14782.87331.Mailman@netfilter-sponsored-by.noris.net>
2003-11-04 14:49 ` Michael Friedhoff
2003-11-04 22:18   ` Alistair Tonner
2003-11-07 16:53   ` Harald Welte
2002-07-21 14:00 memory leak? Måns Rullgård
2002-07-21 14:19 ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-21 14:23   ` Måns Rullgård
2002-07-21 16:33     ` Alan Cox
2002-07-21 20:48       ` Måns Rullgård
2002-07-21 21:08         ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-30 16:08           ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-30 16:43             ` Rik van Riel
2002-07-22 14:08 ` Andrew Rodland
2002-07-21 14:19   ` Måns Rullgård
2002-07-21 14:20   ` Martin Josefsson
2002-07-21 22:27     ` Stephan Maciej
2002-07-22 14:26     ` Andrew Rodland
2002-07-21 14:50       ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1310141349-sup-9515@shiny \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=cwillu@cwillu.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.