From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ioeventfd: Introduce KVM_IOEVENTFD_FLAG_SOCKET Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:44:34 +0300 Message-ID: <1311155074.5161.9.camel@jaguar> References: <1309927078-5983-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <1309927078-5983-5-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <20110706114203.GA18368@redhat.com> <1309964506.15123.13.camel@sasha> <20110706155135.GA21638@redhat.com> <1310276083.2393.6.camel@sasha> <20110710080559.GC1630@redhat.com> <1310469824.2393.22.camel@sasha> <4E1C2F59.90600@redhat.com> <4E1D442E.6090308@redhat.com> <4E264238.2000803@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Sasha Levin , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Marcelo Tosatti To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from filtteri1.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.184]:50628 "EHLO filtteri1.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751146Ab1GTJoh (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:44:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E264238.2000803@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 21:49 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > If you're not going to emulate a UART properly, why not just use a > paravirtual serial device that you can keep simple? We want to emulate it correctly to make it robust. The problems you pointed out were caused by me being under heavy dose of ignorance when I wrote the emulation code. ;-) Pekka