From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Andreas Olsowski <andreas.olsowski@leuphana.de>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: hanging tapdisk2 processes and improper udev rules
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:28:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311326922.12772.14.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E294068.2030700@leuphana.de>
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 10:18 +0100, Andreas Olsowski wrote:
> When i xl-create a guest, i get one message per assigned block device:
>
> root@xenturio1:/var/log# xl create /etc/xen/domains/x1test.sxp
> Parsing config file /etc/xen/domains/x1test.sxp
> Daemon running with PID 8704
>
> root@xenturio1:/var/log# tail -10 error |grep SYMLINK
> syslog:Jul 22 10:58:05 xenturio1 udevd[8658]: kernel-provided name
> 'blktap2' and NAME= 'xen/blktap-2/blktap2' disagree, please use
> SYMLINK+= or change the kernel to provide the proper name
> syslog:Jul 22 10:58:05 xenturio1 udevd[8664]: kernel-provided name
> 'blktap3' and NAME= 'xen/blktap-2/blktap3' disagree, please use
> SYMLINK+= or change the kernel to provide the proper name
This is because udev and forward/backward compatibility are strangers
passing in the night. I presume if you make the recommended change to
SYMLINK+= instead of NAME= in your udev script this goes away?
> Then i shutdown the guest:
> root@xenturio1:/var/log# xl shutdown x1test
>
> And i am left with remaining tapdisk2 and udev processes, one for each
> block device that was assigned to the guest:
> root 8975 0.1 0.0 21664 3256 ? SLs 11:00 0:00 tapdisk2
> root 8981 0.0 0.0 21664 3256 ? SLs 11:00 0:00 tapdisk2
> root 8983 0.0 0.0 21008 796 ? S 11:00 0:00 udevd
> --daemon
> root 9002 0.0 0.0 21008 800 ? S 11:00 0:00 udevd
> --daemon
I posted a patch to fix this "libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk
processes on disk backend destroy" a couple of times, most recently at
http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=131066210526755 but it hasn't been
applied yet. Can you try it?
> I am using Xen 4.1.1 with the 2.6.32.43-pvops kernel from jeremy.
> My distro is debian 6.0.2. that uses udev 164-3.
> I did update it on a different machine to 171-3, but that did not help.
>
>
> My xen-backend.rules contains the default:
> SUBSYSTEM=="xen", KERNEL=="blktap[0-9]*", NAME="xen/blktap-2/%k",
> MODE="0600"
> SUBSYSTEM=="blktap2", KERNEL=="blktap[0-9]*", NAME="xen/blktap-2/%k",
> MODE="0600
>
>
> My questions are:
> - Are the two issues related?
> - How can i fix them?
>
>
> I think that eventually this will cause the host to run out of either
> free process IDs and/or RAM.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-22 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-22 9:18 hanging tapdisk2 processes and improper udev rules Andreas Olsowski
2011-07-22 9:28 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2011-07-22 11:36 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-07-22 14:07 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-22 14:28 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-07-22 14:32 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-25 8:55 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-08-11 13:32 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-07-22 9:31 ` Daniel Stodden
2011-07-22 9:32 ` Daniel Stodden
2011-07-22 9:34 ` Sébastien RICCIO
2011-07-22 9:50 ` Daniel Stodden
2011-07-22 10:01 ` Sébastien RICCIO
2011-07-22 18:55 ` hanging tapdisk2 processes and multipathing Daniel Stodden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311326922.12772.14.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andreas.olsowski@leuphana.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.