All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Cc: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>,
	Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] rebase -i: don't fork git checkout
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:44:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311e9e9-6d10-40f8-2073-077313a94301@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BEbY0BqkBP4r-6XpGk46J+Y+W8+7cVZXQg5fuJXYOntDQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Elijah

On 09/09/2021 16:01, Elijah Newren wrote:
> [...]
>> merge-ort.c:checkout() which is used by merge_switch_to_result() uses
>> unpack_trees() so it will pick up the global state and hopefully should
>> just work (cc'ing Elijah to check as I didn't look what happens when
>> there are conflicts).
> 
> Yep, merge-ort was designed to just piggy back on checkout code.  The
> checkout() function was basically just code lifted from
> builtin/checkout.c.  Using that code means that merges now also
> benefit from all the special working tree handling that is encoded
> into git-checkout -- whether that's parallel checkout, submodule
> handling, tricky D/F switches or symlink handling, etc.  In contrast
> to merge-recursive, it does not need hundreds and hundreds of lines of
> special worktree updating code sprayed all over the codebase.
> 
> Conflicts are not special in this regard; merge-ort creates a tree
> which has files that include conflict markers, and then merge-ort
> calls checkout() to switch the working copy over to that tree.
> 
> The only issue conflicts present for merge-ort, is that AFTER it has
> checked out that special tree with conflict markers, it then has to go
> and touch up the index afterwards to replace the entries for
> conflicted files with multiple higher order stages.  (You could say
> that merge-recursive is "index-first", since its design focuses on the
> index -- updating it first and then figuring out everything else like
> updating the working tree with special code afterwards.  In contrast,
> merge-ort ignores the index entirely until the very end -- after a new
> merge tree is created and after the working tree is updated.)

Thanks for explaining, it's a nice design feature that you can just reuse
the checkout code to update the working copy with the merge result

>> merge-recursive.c:update_file_flags() does this
>> when updating the work tree
>>
>>          if (S_ISGITLINK(contents->mode)) {
>>                   /*
>>                    * We may later decide to recursively descend into
>>                    * the submodule directory and update its index
>>                    * and/or work tree, but we do not do that now.
>>                    */
>>                   update_wd = 0;
>>                   goto update_index;
>>          }
>>
>> so it looks like it does not update the submodule directory. Given
>> merge-ort is now the default perhaps it's time for rebase (and
>> cherry-pick/revert) to start reading the submodule config settings (we
>> parse the config before we know if we'll be using merge-ort so I don't
>> know how easy it would be to only parse the submodule settings if we are
>> using merge-ort).
> 
> I'd just parse any needed config in all cases.  The submodule settings
> aren't going to hurt merge-recursive; it'll just ignore them.  (Or are
> you worried about a mix-and-match of rebase calling both checkout and
> merge code doing weird things, and you'd rather not have the checkout
> bits update submodules if the merges won't?)

I'd rather just parse the config when we know submodules are going to be
rebased, I think it's confusing if some bit work and others don't. I've
tried the diff below locally, but t7402-submodule-rebase.sh does not show
any change (I was hoping some text_expect_failure would be fixed) so I'm
not sure if it's working or not and I ran out of time.

Best Wishes

Phillip

--- >8 ---
diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
index eed70168df..a35a9e3460 100644
--- a/builtin/rebase.c
+++ b/builtin/rebase.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
  #include "rerere.h"
  #include "branch.h"
  #include "sequencer.h"
+#include "submodule.h"
  #include "rebase-interactive.h"
  #include "reset.h"
  
@@ -1114,6 +1115,10 @@ static int rebase_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *data)
                 return git_config_string(&opts->default_backend, var, value);
         }
  
+       if (starts_with(var, "submodule.")) {
+               return git_default_submodule_config(var, value, NULL);
+       }
+
         return git_default_config(var, value, data);
  }
  
@@ -1820,6 +1825,12 @@ int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
             getenv("GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM"))
                 options.strategy = xstrdup(getenv("GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM"));
  
+       /* only the "ort" merge strategy handles submodules correctly */
+       if (!is_merge(&options) ||
+           (options.strategy && strcmp(options.strategy, "ort")))
+               git_default_submodule_config("submodule.recurse", "false",
+                                            NULL);
+
         switch (options.type) {
         case REBASE_MERGE:
         case REBASE_PRESERVE_MERGES:
  

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-15 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-08 13:41 [PATCH 0/5] rebase -i: a couple of small improvements Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-09-08 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] sequencer.c: factor out a function Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-09-08 17:51   ` Eric Sunshine
2021-09-09 10:10     ` Phillip Wood
2021-09-09 10:44   ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-09-08 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] rebase: fix todo-list rereading Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-09-09 10:48   ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-09-08 13:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] reset_head(): mark oid parameter as const Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-09-08 13:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] rebase -i: don't fork git checkout Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-09-08 18:14   ` Philippe Blain
2021-09-09 10:09     ` Phillip Wood
2021-09-09 12:40       ` Philippe Blain
2021-09-09 13:57         ` Phillip Wood
2021-09-09 15:01           ` Elijah Newren
2021-09-10 12:07             ` Philippe Blain
2021-09-15 15:44             ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2021-09-09 10:53     ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-09-09 12:44       ` Philippe Blain
2021-09-09 21:43         ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-09-10 10:46         ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-09-10 11:58           ` Philippe Blain
2021-09-09 15:03   ` Elijah Newren
2021-09-08 13:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] rebase: remove unused parameter Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-09-09 10:54   ` Johannes Schindelin
2021-09-09 14:04     ` Phillip Wood
2021-09-23 15:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] rebase -i: a couple of small improvements Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-09-23 15:26   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sequencer.c: factor out a function Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-09-23 15:26   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rebase: fix todo-list rereading Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-09-24 16:13     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28 10:20       ` Phillip Wood
2021-09-24 19:24   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] rebase -i: a couple of small improvements Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1311e9e9-6d10-40f8-2073-077313a94301@gmail.com \
    --to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.