From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp5sT-0005q1-KU for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:54:53 +0200 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.3]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp5oG-0004t2-0X for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:50:32 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:50:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1312494624.3169.1.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] kernel, module-base.bbclass: fix KERNEL_LD & KERNEL_AR vars X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:54:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kamble@intel.com wrote: > From: Nitin A Kamble > > KERNEL_LD was using ${LD} in it's definition, which is not correct for > different ABIs such as x32 or i386 on x86_64 machine. > > Same with KERNEL_AR var. Why is ar an issue? That doesn't have any unusual args, does it? p.