From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp5sz-0005ri-0l for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:55:25 +0200 Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=[192.168.114.3]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qp5ol-0004t8-E5 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:51:03 +0200 From: Phil Blundell To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: <03d062a7104f31d03893833485ec3836c07e8f90.1312469790.git.nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> References: <03d062a7104f31d03893833485ec3836c07e8f90.1312469790.git.nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:50:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1312494646.3169.2.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] glibc: bring back the needed support for glibc recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:55:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:01 -0700, nitin.a.kamble@intel.com wrote: > From: Nitin A Kamble > > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble This commit message is very terse. Why is this change necessary? p.