From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aob106.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.76]:48614 "EHLO na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753111Ab1HILyM (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:54:12 -0400 Received: by mail-ey0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 4so4992761eye.17 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 04:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/40] wl12xx: Revert "wl12xx: schedule TX packets according to FW occupancy" From: Luciano Coelho To: Eliad Peller Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1312881233-9366-2-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> References: <1312881233-9366-1-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <1312881233-9366-2-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:54:07 +0300 Message-ID: <1312890847.2407.158.camel@cumari> (sfid-20110809_135415_912998_C62CC304) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:13 +0300, Eliad Peller wrote: > From: Arik Nemtsov > > This does not make sense in 7.3 firmware - we don't use Tx blocks to > measure FW occupancy anymore. Should we be more precise about the firmware versions here? Maybe mentioning >= 7.3.0.0.75 for wl128x and >= 6.3.0.0.75 for wl127x would be good? Should we also add a file, eg. called firmware.txt, in order to make it easy for people to know which firmware they need to use for that specific version? Of course we already have the fw-3 thingy, and we should try to keep the kernel mainline always in sync with the linux-firmware mainline, but maybe being more explicit would help users of older kernels... It seems to be a recurring problem. -- Cheers, Luca.