Re: [PATCH 1/1] gcc-cross-intermediate: revise the 64bithack.patch for multilib case

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 20:48 +0800, Yu Ke wrote:
> On 2011/8/15 1:31, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >
> > Op 14 aug. 2011, om 15:32 heeft Yu Ke het volgende geschreven:
> >
> >> current gcc-cross-intermediate has build failure in qemux86-64 lib64
> >> multilib case. the reason is that it still use lib instead of lib64
> >> while do_install use the libdir i.e. lib64
> >>
> >> so this patch fix this issue by making gcc honour the libdir.
> >>
> >> CC: Kumar Gala<galak@kernel.crashing.org>
> >> CC: Richard Purdie<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yu Ke<ke.yu@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc             |    2 +-
> >> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/64bithack.patch |   16 +++++++++-------
> >
> > wouldn't gcc 4.5 need a similar change?
> 
> yes, gcc 4.5 should also has this change. I will sent out another patch 
> for this.

Please take a look at:

http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=rpurdie/ml4&id=4de8e0e9c286ff64f1b7fd2e695fe2d62fdadfbd

I've updated the patch header and ensured that whichever compiler
options are used, the compiler works as expected and also applied this
to mips and pcc.

Could you also please open a bug about target gcc multilib as mentioned
in the patch header (targeted at post 1.1).

> just curious question, what is gcc 4.5 for, since gcc 4.6 is already there?

Some people are still using gcc 4.5 for various reasons. It is getting
to the point we should probably move that to meta-oe though?

Cheers,

Richard