All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: don't serialise direct IO reads on page cache checks
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:17:01 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1314256626-11136-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314256626-11136-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

There is no need to grab the i_mutex of the IO lock in exclusive
mode if we don't need to invalidate the page cache. Taking these
locks on every direct IO effective serialises them as taking the IO
lock in exclusive mode has to wait for all shared holders to drop
the lock. That only happens when IO is complete, so effective it
prevents dispatch of concurrent direct IO reads to the same inode.

Fix this by taking the IO lock shared to check the page cache state,
and only then drop it and take the IO lock exclusively if there is
work to be done. Hence for the normal direct IO case, no exclusive
locking will occur.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 2fdc6d1..a1dea10 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -317,7 +317,19 @@ xfs_file_aio_read(
 	if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	if (unlikely(ioflags & IO_ISDIRECT)) {
+	/*
+	 * Locking is a bit tricky here. If we take an exclusive lock
+	 * for direct IO, we effectively serialise all new concurrent
+	 * read IO to this file and block it behind IO that is currently in
+	 * progress because IO in progress holds the IO lock shared. We only
+	 * need to hold the lock exclusive to blow away the page cache, so
+	 * only take lock exclusively if the page cache needs invalidation.
+	 * This allows the normal direct IO case of no page cache pages to
+	 * proceeed concurrently without serialisation.
+	 */
+	xfs_rw_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED);
+	if ((ioflags & IO_ISDIRECT) && inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
+		xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED);
 		xfs_rw_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
 
 		if (inode->i_mapping->nrpages) {
@@ -330,8 +342,7 @@ xfs_file_aio_read(
 			}
 		}
 		xfs_rw_ilock_demote(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
-	} else
-		xfs_rw_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED);
+	}
 
 	trace_xfs_file_read(ip, size, iocb->ki_pos, ioflags);
 
-- 
1.7.5.4

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-25  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-25  7:17 [PATCH 0/6] xfs: patch queue for Linux 3.2 Dave Chinner
2011-08-25  7:17 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-08-25  7:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: don't serialise adjacent concurrent direct IO appending writes Dave Chinner
2011-08-25 21:08   ` Alex Elder
2011-08-26  2:19     ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-25  7:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: Don't allocate new buffers on every call to _xfs_buf_find Dave Chinner
2011-08-25 20:56   ` Alex Elder
2011-08-25 23:57     ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-25  7:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: reduce the number of log forces from tail pushing Dave Chinner
2011-08-25 20:57   ` Alex Elder
2011-08-25 23:47     ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-25  7:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: re-arrange all the xfsbufd delwri queue code Dave Chinner
2011-08-25 20:57   ` Alex Elder
2011-08-25  7:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: convert xfsbufd to use a workqueue Dave Chinner
2011-08-25 20:57   ` Alex Elder
2011-08-25 23:46     ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-26  0:18       ` Dave Chinner
2011-11-23 21:38 [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable Ben Myers
2011-11-23 21:38 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: don't serialise direct IO reads on page cache checks Ben Myers
2011-11-28 21:40 [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable Greg KH
2011-11-30 18:10 ` XFS update for 3.1-stable (resent) Ben Myers
2011-11-30 18:10   ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: don't serialise direct IO reads on page cache checks Ben Myers
2011-12-01 23:27 [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable (again) Ben Myers
2011-12-01 23:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: don't serialise direct IO reads on page cache checks Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1314256626-11136-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.