From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.gw90.de ([188.40.100.199]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QzVdl-0001eC-R2; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:26:45 +0200 Received: from f053042120.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.53.42.120] helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mail.gw90.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QzVZB-00056X-89; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:22:01 +0000 From: Paul Menzel To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:21:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1314969543.5939.586.camel@rex> References: <1314962732.3526.32.camel@mattotaupa> <1314969543.5939.586.camel@rex> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1314976910.3526.36.camel@mattotaupa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:26:45 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 34020 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-y9fBCtBBPJbH2SsaL5y6" --=-y9fBCtBBPJbH2SsaL5y6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Richard Purdie: > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 10:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 08:25, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > it would be great if we could join the lists oe-devel and oe-core aga= in. > > > As far as I know the only reason the list oe-core was created was to > > > discuss the initial setup and the creation of oe-core. Now that it ha= s > > > been setup I do not see any reason to have two separate lists. > > > > > > I suggest to abandon/archive openembedded-core and use > > > openembedded-devel. > >=20 > > I fully support this merge. >=20 > I'm not so sure rushing into this is a great idea. I interpret your answer that the merge is planned. What is the right time then? > Speaking as someone who has problems trying to figure out where > patches are intended for Also now you have to decide to what list to send them to. Now you just add a prefix/tag as is done on oe-devel already to differentiate between oe.dev and meta-oe. > and who tracks whether they've been applied, Well, the list is not a patch tracker. The patch queue is [1]. > I do find the split useful... Hmm, could you please elaborate? Thanks, Paul [1] http://patches.openembedded.org/ --=-y9fBCtBBPJbH2SsaL5y6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk5g9I0ACgkQPX1aK2wOHVj0ewCbBWYOA8nSSd2pANJJspD6TEaL znUAnR3N5K7VQ+3LUjymPuWGEglrm7Ld =SqjJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-y9fBCtBBPJbH2SsaL5y6--