From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <4E60A054.30101@domain.hid> References: <509DA52866E38F47878413CF102D751FED236D7830@domain.hid> <4E5F6E41.1050606@domain.hid> <509DA52866E38F47878413CF102D751FED236D7834@domain.hid> <4E5F753C.8070904@domain.hid> <509DA52866E38F47878413CF102D751FED236D783D@poseidon.nexus-ag.com> <4E5F9FDB.5080702@domain.hid> <509DA52866E38F47878413CF102D751FED236D783F@poseidon.nexus-ag.com> <1314908857.18201.28.camel@domain.hid> <509DA52866E38F47878413CF102D751FED236D784C@poseidon.nexus-ag.com> <1314950450.22237.14.camel@domain.hid> <4E60A054.30101@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:32:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1314977554.22237.15.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] taskDelete(tid) on VxWorks Skin ? List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: "Xenomai-help@domain.hid" On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 11:22 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On 09/02/2011 10:00 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 09:29 +0200, Sambasiva Rao Manchili wrote: > >> Thank you Philippe for your time. > >> Right now I did a workaround with a flag after deleting a task and checking this flag before doing any operation by task that was deleted. It works for me. > >> I could not believe taskDelete did not work till yesterday. > > > > A kernel change has not been propagated to the vxworks library years > > ago. In the absence of user feedback and vxworks-specific testsuite in > > Xenomai 2.x, we are blind. > > > >> > >> I hope with next version of Xenomail release the tested patch for taskDelete will be available and for now I live with my workaround. > >> > >> Overall porting of VxWorks code, Integration and testing since three months. I faced only two issues for which I got blocked. > >> 1. semTake with specific timeout value failed in Xenomai. As a workaround I just removed this semTake and semGive , which is also OK to an extent in this area of code. > > > > Unlike the one with taskDelete(), this sema4 issue is surprising to me. > > Can you elaborate? > > The issue was discussed here: > https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2011-08/msg00021.html > Then we know for sure this is not related to a timeout issue. -- Philippe.