From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QzWyj-0005ON-8i; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:52:29 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p82GlWpv027479; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:47:32 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27043-03; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:47:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p82GlO0w027473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:47:26 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: <1314962732.3526.32.camel@mattotaupa> <1314969543.5939.586.camel@rex> <89FA71E7-9402-4458-BC9E-42655707B091@dominion.thruhere.net> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:47:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1314982026.5939.607.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [oe] Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:52:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 10:53 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:33, Koen Kooi wrote: > > That sounds like people should just subscribe to oe-core if they want to be aware of changes instead of merging the 2 lists. > > Many times changes are related to meta-oe and oe-core and we'd need to > cross-post and seems wrong. I don't think this is actually true and its reasonable to assume discussion on OE-Core is seen by everyone. You therefore need an OE-Core subscription or both with the latter recommended. The benefit is the two lists give some kind of filtering of the email topics. Cheers, Richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QzWyj-0005ON-8i; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:52:29 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p82GlWpv027479; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:47:32 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27043-03; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:47:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p82GlO0w027473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:47:26 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer In-Reply-To: References: <1314962732.3526.32.camel@mattotaupa> <1314969543.5939.586.camel@rex> <89FA71E7-9402-4458-BC9E-42655707B091@dominion.thruhere.net> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:47:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1314982026.5939.607.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:52:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 10:53 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:33, Koen Kooi wrote: > > That sounds like people should just subscribe to oe-core if they want to be aware of changes instead of merging the 2 lists. > > Many times changes are related to meta-oe and oe-core and we'd need to > cross-post and seems wrong. I don't think this is actually true and its reasonable to assume discussion on OE-Core is seen by everyone. You therefore need an OE-Core subscription or both with the latter recommended. The benefit is the two lists give some kind of filtering of the email topics. Cheers, Richard