From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.gw90.de ([188.40.100.199]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Qzbgd-0004ez-8N for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:54:07 +0200 Received: from f053042120.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.53.42.120] helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mail.gw90.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qzbc3-0006M1-65 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:49:23 +0000 From: Paul Menzel To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:49:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1314962732.3526.32.camel@mattotaupa> <1314976910.3526.36.camel@mattotaupa> <1314989318.17121.11.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <201109022129.26555.schnitzeltony@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1315000152.6109.14.camel@mattotaupa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Please merge lists openembedded-devel and openembedded-core again. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:54:07 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 34032 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2VOMmQUxg1UFHBMHc84z" --=-2VOMmQUxg1UFHBMHc84z Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 23:34 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi: > Op 02-09-11 21:29, Andreas M=C3=BCller schreef: > > On Friday, September 02, 2011 08:48:38 PM Phil Blundell wrote: > >> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:21 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > >>> Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Richard Purdie: > >>>> I do find the split useful... > >>>=20 > >>> Hmm, could you please elaborate? > >>=20 > >> Not that I'm Richard, but I do find the split useful as well.=20 > >> Personally I am much less interested in the traffic on the oe-devel > >> list and I often ignore that one; I've been somewhat tempted to just= =20 > >> unsubscribe altogether since there doesn't appear to be all that much > >> of value (to me) going on there. >=20 > > I would even prefer having additional meta-oe list separated from > > oe-dev. >=20 > If there's enough need for it, that can get arranged. Why should that be needed? Maybe proposals could be explained and backed up with arguments for a discussion. Thanks, Paul --=-2VOMmQUxg1UFHBMHc84z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk5hT1YACgkQPX1aK2wOHVjVFACfZUjBu7oGbFeiM4bdGds1v1HI q6UAn1qUyCKaT+IVQtvba71AL5POWTNo =0PdW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2VOMmQUxg1UFHBMHc84z--