From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: JavMV Subject: Re: Re : Re : Re : Re : Re: Patches for VGA-Passthrough XEN 4.2 unstable Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 05:55:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1316696154780-4830056.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1316612652132-4826391.post@n5.nabble.com> <1316613404292-4826432.post@n5.nabble.com> <1316614084705-4826479.post@n5.nabble.com> <1316615526442-4826582.post@n5.nabble.com> <1316616001843-4826614.post@n5.nabble.com> <1316616472579-4826635.post@n5.nabble.com> <1316616757871-4826655.post@n5.nabble.com> <1316618006.67296.YahooMailNeo@web29818.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <1316693722029-4829929.post@n5.nabble.com> <1316695546329-4830015.post@n5.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1316695546329-4830015.post@n5.nabble.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Well I think that vt-d(iommu) is the same feature than the next one: Intel(R) VT for Directed I/O (VT-d) An extract from wikipedia tell us this: Intel has published a specification for IOMMU technology as Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O, abbreviated VT-d So I have already enabled the necessary options (and there isn't any other option in my BIOS related with this), besides with the same options enabled in BIOS I was able to use passthrough in the past ----- JavMV -- View this message in context: http://xen.1045712.n5.nabble.com/Patches-for-VGA-Passthrough-XEN-4-2-unstable-tp4406265p4830056.html Sent from the Xen - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.