On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 11:24 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:00:14 -0400, Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > This code is still present in Linus' tree, and still crap.  Any
> > reviewers for this series?
> 
> It all looks reasonable to me, and Chris reviewed or ack'd every patch
> but #4, which looks reasonable on the surface to me.
> 
> Are you thinking this should land in 3.1? Or 3.2?

#1 should definitely land in 3.1 if at all possible.  The rest can wait
I guess.

I'd still like to get more dialogue about #4 from Rolf or someone else
with multifunc sdvo.  That, or such a device on my shelf.  I can buy one
if someone knows what I should buy.

- ajax