From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Remove "i2c_speed" nonsense
 from child device table
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:34:31 -0400
Message-ID: <1316716472.14071.256.camel@atropine>
References: <1308256588-8026-1-git-send-email-ajax@redhat.com>
	<1316700015.14071.225.camel@atropine> <yunzkhwv3jc.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0861641365=="
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F739E7CA
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <yunzkhwv3jc.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org


--===============0861641365==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-PC9asQ0X6D8vJtEAKR8G"


--=-PC9asQ0X6D8vJtEAKR8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 11:24 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:00:14 -0400, Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com> wrote:
>=20
> > This code is still present in Linus' tree, and still crap.  Any
> > reviewers for this series?
>=20
> It all looks reasonable to me, and Chris reviewed or ack'd every patch
> but #4, which looks reasonable on the surface to me.
>=20
> Are you thinking this should land in 3.1? Or 3.2?

#1 should definitely land in 3.1 if at all possible.  The rest can wait
I guess.

I'd still like to get more dialogue about #4 from Rolf or someone else
with multifunc sdvo.  That, or such a device on my shelf.  I can buy one
if someone knows what I should buy.

- ajax

--=-PC9asQ0X6D8vJtEAKR8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEUEABECAAYFAk57f7cACgkQW4otUKDs0NP0qACY7EJrsqBsNDOCmsCnvV4DvPtb
2wCfbfJTMziB+qFx8g9ykLimCO24GAw=
=l7Ub
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-PC9asQ0X6D8vJtEAKR8G--


--===============0861641365==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--===============0861641365==--