From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: LC Bruzenak Subject: Re: performance questions Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:20:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1317392443.2038.19.camel@lcb> References: <1317310389.2959.93.camel@lcb> <201109300920.01318.sgrubb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201109300920.01318.sgrubb@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Steve Grubb Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 09:20 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:33:09 AM LC Bruzenak wrote: ... > > You might try this: ... > > - _get_exename(exename, sizeof(exename)); > + if (exename[0] == 0) > + _get_exename(exename, sizeof(exename)); > if (tty == NULL) > tty = _get_tty(ttyname, TTY_PATH); > else if (*tty == 0) Well, we could (and then it would work like the others) but we really want to store the exename I think. Isn't that what becomes "exe=" in the event? > > We can probably use the return value of fprintf() +1 (for the NULL byte) and > just keep the running total in memory. Oh, right. That would be more precise. Good idea! Since we're looking, what about the fstatfs in check_disk_space? Any thoughts on that one? Thanks Steve! LCB -- LC (Lenny) Bruzenak lenny@magitekltd.com