From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([93.97.175.187]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R9gJc-0006Pr-SH for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:52:01 +0200 Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p8UGqt40031573 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:52:55 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5EqFuFkFOcFI for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:52:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.40] (tim [93.97.173.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p8UGqpW5031567 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:52:52 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:46:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.1.91- Message-ID: <1317401191.12332.213.camel@ted> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [WIP][PATCH 0/9] Glib related upgrades X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:52:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 17:43 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > We were using 2.29.3+git% from meta-oe and after upgrade to 2.30.0 I was hit > by few G_CONST_RETURN and other issues due to newer glib. Here is what I have > now to build shr images OK again, but probably there is more recipes which need > upgrade/fix to cope with glib-2.30.0. > > Someone who cares about gnome should continue from this, but IMHO this is good start :). These are marked as WIP. Does this mean they are ready to be taken or is there a reason to hold off these patches? Cheers, Richard