All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] sched: use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:13:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317676434.11592.156.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317670590.20367.38.camel@twins>

On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 12:36 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 15:30 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> 
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched.c      |   14 +++++++++++---
> >  kernel/sched_fair.c |   27 +++++++--------------------
> >  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -2733,7 +2733,7 @@ void scheduler_ipi(void)
> >  	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> >  	struct task_struct *list = xchg(&rq->wake_list, NULL);
> >  
> > -	if (!list)
> > +	if (!list && !idle_cpu(cpu_of(rq)))
> >  		return;
> 
> Why not make that !rq->nohz_balance_kick? (wrapped in a helper for !
> CONFIG_NO_HZ)

If a rq gets busy before we do nohz_idle_balance() which does the
nohz_balance_kick reset, we will have a busy rq with nohz_balance_kick
set. And wanted to bail out sooner by checking for idle cpu and minimize
the impact for a busy rq having the nohz_idle_balance set.

I can probably rename your got_nohz_kick() as got_nohz_idle_kick() and
fix it.

> > tself as idle load_balancer, while
> > @@ -4450,11 +4434,14 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(int cpu)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (!cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_balance_kick) {
> > -		struct call_single_data *cp;
> > -
> >  		cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_balance_kick = 1;
> > -		cp = &per_cpu(remote_sched_softirq_cb, cpu);
> > -		__smp_call_function_single(ilb_cpu, cp, 0);
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Use kick_process instead of resched_cpu.
> > +		 * This way we generate a sched IPI on the target cpu which
> > +		 * is idle. And the softirq performing nohz idle load balance
> > +		 * will be run before returning from the IPI.
> > +		 */
> 
> Shouldn't we have a memory barrier of sorts before sending the IPI?
> 
> > +		kick_process(idle_task(ilb_cpu));

Correct and also I think we can use smp_send_reschedule() directly
instead of kick process. Will fix it.

thanks,
suresh


  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-03 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-29 22:30 [patch 1/2] sched: use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance Suresh Siddha
2011-09-29 22:30 ` [patch 2/2] sched: request for idle balance during nohz idle load balance Suresh Siddha
2011-10-03 19:36 ` [patch 1/2] sched: use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-03 21:13   ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2011-10-03 19:40 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1317676434.11592.156.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.