From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933440Ab1JDWOs (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:14:48 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:47186 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932820Ab1JDWOr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:14:47 -0400 Subject: Re: Quick review of -rt RCU-related patches From: Peter Zijlstra To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-rt-users , LKML In-Reply-To: References: <20111004174755.GA4762@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:13:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1317766398.32543.39.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 00:05 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > I consider rcu_bh a bandaid for the nasty implict semantics of BH > processing and I'm looking really forward to Peters analysis of the > modern cpu local BKL constructs at RTLWS. You and me both! Oh wait.. :-)