From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933292Ab1JEIYd (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:24:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:36655 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932104Ab1JEIYb (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 04:24:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [Quilt-dev] [RFC][PATCH v2][QUILT] Add gpg signing to quilt mail From: Andreas Gruenbacher To: Greg KH Cc: quilt-dev@nongnu.org, Peter Zijlstra , LKML , "H. Peter Anvin" , John Kacur , Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:23:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20111005065309.GA6676@suse.de> References: <1317750395.18063.11.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20111004180237.GA15087@suse.de> <1317752148.18063.16.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20111004182615.GA16224@suse.de> <1317753468.18063.19.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1317779312.1662.37.camel@schurl.linbit> <20111005065309.GA6676@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3 (3.0.3-1.fc15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1317803067.1623.4.camel@schurl.linbit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 23:53 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > "now" meaning which version of quilt? I still see this on 0.48 if that > matters. In the repository (master branch). > > > > Oh, then there's the issue of quilt not handling ',' in a Signed-off-by > > > > line as a valid email address name, but I've been living with that one > > > > for years... > > > > That's not even valid in email addresses. The proper way would be to > > double-quote the "display name" which probably contains the comma, but > > then quilt's edmail script still won't understand it. Is this a real > > problem? > > Yes, quoting is the correct thing to do, but that does not usually > happen in "Signed-off-by:" lines in kernel patches. > > Actually, I think this is even a problem when the name is quoted > properly, I've had to fix that up in patches by hand. Yes, proper quoting currently isn't enough. > And yes, this is a problem, I run into at least 1-2 patches per stable > kernel release with this issue. I looked into fixing it and somehow the > email parsing logic was wierd and I couldn't figure out how to resolve > it. Okay, I'll have another look ... Andreas