From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] remove an outdated reference to T/TCP Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:58:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1323248287.2690.41.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <20111206200005.836D529006DD@tardy> <20111206.151920.696192671128392379.davem@davemloft.net> <4EDE8B8B.2000907@hp.com> <20111206.164243.402402261622724566.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , rick.jones2@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Yuchung Cheng Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:48973 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753931Ab1LGI6M (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2011 03:58:12 -0500 Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so234285eek.19 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:58:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le mardi 06 d=C3=A9cembre 2011 =C3=A0 15:00 -0800, Yuchung Cheng a =C3=A9= crit : > I am fine keeping the comment as is. This does remind me to put more > comments on this part of the code in our upcoming Fast Open patch :) This sounds great. Is TFO patch using inetpeer cache to store cookies ? (I ask this because TFO paper I read mentions linux-2.6.34, I presume you couldnt use inetpeer at that time since it was IPv4 only)