From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753622Ab1L1Kck (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:32:40 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:45364 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752625Ab1L1Kci (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:32:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1325068334.6632.43.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:32:14 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20111228194949.ff20a609745e816c266f7d91@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20111228194949.ff20a609745e816c266f7d91@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 19:49 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi , > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_dispose_mapping': > (.opd+0x159f0): multiple definition of `irq_dispose_mapping' > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.opd+0x960): first defined here > kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_create_of_mapping': > (.opd+0x15a20): multiple definition of `irq_create_of_mapping' > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.opd+0x9a8): first defined here > kernel/built-in.o: In function `.irq_create_of_mapping': > (.text+0x147030): multiple definition of `.irq_create_of_mapping' > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.text+0x9de0): first defined here > kernel/built-in.o: In function `.irq_dispose_mapping': > (.text+0x146f4c): multiple definition of `.irq_dispose_mapping' > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.text+0x9684): first defined here > > I am not sure what caused this. And have just left it broken. Grant, is your irq remapper misbehaving ? Cheers, Ben. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2CB0B6FA6 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:32:32 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1325068334.6632.43.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related) From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stephen Rothwell Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:32:14 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20111228194949.ff20a609745e816c266f7d91@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20111228194949.ff20a609745e816c266f7d91@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 19:49 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi , > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_dispose_mapping': > (.opd+0x159f0): multiple definition of `irq_dispose_mapping' > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.opd+0x960): first defined here > kernel/built-in.o: In function `irq_create_of_mapping': > (.opd+0x15a20): multiple definition of `irq_create_of_mapping' > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.opd+0x9a8): first defined here > kernel/built-in.o: In function `.irq_create_of_mapping': > (.text+0x147030): multiple definition of `.irq_create_of_mapping' > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.text+0x9de0): first defined here > kernel/built-in.o: In function `.irq_dispose_mapping': > (.text+0x146f4c): multiple definition of `.irq_dispose_mapping' > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o:(.text+0x9684): first defined here > > I am not sure what caused this. And have just left it broken. Grant, is your irq remapper misbehaving ? Cheers, Ben.