From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Laager Subject: Re: [RFC] The reflink(2) system call v5. Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:33:35 -0600 Message-ID: <1328420015.5007.303.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> References: <1328419914.5007.301.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-paxriyMHpqPk5WpcgJPA" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Joel Becker Return-path: Received: from spam1.wiktel.com ([69.89.207.151]:46377 "EHLO spam1.wiktel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750786Ab2BEFrE (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2012 00:47:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1328419914.5007.301.camel@watermelon.coderich.net> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-paxriyMHpqPk5WpcgJPA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 22:24 -0500, Joel Becker wrote: > Here's v5 of reflink(). So, what ever happened with reflink(2)? This [0] is the last message I can find on the topic and it doesn't seem to have been merged. [0] http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-fsdevel&m=3D125296717319013&w=3D2 --=20 Richard --=-paxriyMHpqPk5WpcgJPA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk8uFKkACgkQbfU6uV4fG85JEwCg87szanJZEWcvfEQEpZb6J9FY E9sAoNmMbfJx/0KWVe2RRc5uqtjIjcvA =ZZp8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-paxriyMHpqPk5WpcgJPA--