From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gw90.de (mail.gw90.de [188.40.100.199]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4F8E004D2 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:44:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from f053043073.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.53.43.73] helo=[192.168.178.43]) by mail.gw90.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RvFJd-0001P7-1X; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:44:37 +0000 Message-ID: <1328737469.18522.9.camel@mattotaupa> From: Paul Menzel To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:44:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4F32C2B3.7020200@intel.com> References: <4F323C52.8030304@intel.com> <4F32C2B3.7020200@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:06:11 -0800 Cc: Yocto Project Discussion Subject: Re: [OE-core] Upstream-Status finally @ 100% X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:44:35 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 4769 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Lgnmqb0x5coeFufMMfyP" --=-Lgnmqb0x5coeFufMMfyP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2012, 10:45 -0800 schrieb Saul Wold: > On 02/08/2012 10:04 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: > > Ah, documentation :) excellent Saul, thank you for the update and enforcing that requirement from the commit and patch message guidelines. > Jefro: >=20 > You can get more info about this from Mark's OE page: > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines >=20 > The Key thing to note on my numbers is that we have 461 patches that=20 > could potentially be up-streamed to other communities, depending the=20 > status of those communities, from active communities accepting patches= =20 > to upstream source that is just download-able with no activity or=20 > maintainers. Emphasis should be laid on *could*. Sending these patches upstream still has to be done most of the time and most developers do not spend time with that. I hope that will improve in the future somehow. > We have 1243 patches overall, which include OE Specific configuration=20 > patches and Embedded specific tweaks to various upstreams that may not= =20 > be appropriate or acceptable to the upstream community. Thanks, Paul --=-Lgnmqb0x5coeFufMMfyP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk8y7L0ACgkQPX1aK2wOHVgmcgCeJczuz/uWi+oJ/QLBv5YpdobS /DsAnikT7yaIt9D9pfiyAkiIZMTmcSXv =lAzC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Lgnmqb0x5coeFufMMfyP-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.gw90.de ([188.40.100.199]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RvFRL-0002Qm-7B for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:52:35 +0100 Received: from f053043073.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.53.43.73] helo=[192.168.178.43]) by mail.gw90.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RvFJd-0001P7-1X; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:44:37 +0000 Message-ID: <1328737469.18522.9.camel@mattotaupa> From: Paul Menzel To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:44:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4F32C2B3.7020200@intel.com> References: <4F323C52.8030304@intel.com> <4F32C2B3.7020200@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Yocto, Discussion , "Stewart, David C" , "Osier-mixon, Jeffrey" Subject: Re: Upstream-Status finally @ 100% X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:52:35 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 17315 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Lgnmqb0x5coeFufMMfyP" --=-Lgnmqb0x5coeFufMMfyP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2012, 10:45 -0800 schrieb Saul Wold: > On 02/08/2012 10:04 AM, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: > > Ah, documentation :) excellent Saul, thank you for the update and enforcing that requirement from the commit and patch message guidelines. > Jefro: >=20 > You can get more info about this from Mark's OE page: > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines >=20 > The Key thing to note on my numbers is that we have 461 patches that=20 > could potentially be up-streamed to other communities, depending the=20 > status of those communities, from active communities accepting patches= =20 > to upstream source that is just download-able with no activity or=20 > maintainers. Emphasis should be laid on *could*. Sending these patches upstream still has to be done most of the time and most developers do not spend time with that. I hope that will improve in the future somehow. > We have 1243 patches overall, which include OE Specific configuration=20 > patches and Embedded specific tweaks to various upstreams that may not= =20 > be appropriate or acceptable to the upstream community. Thanks, Paul --=-Lgnmqb0x5coeFufMMfyP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk8y7L0ACgkQPX1aK2wOHVgmcgCeJczuz/uWi+oJ/QLBv5YpdobS /DsAnikT7yaIt9D9pfiyAkiIZMTmcSXv =lAzC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Lgnmqb0x5coeFufMMfyP--