On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 15:49 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 23:42 +0000, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> []
> > > @@ -5012,7 +5012,8 @@ static int igb_find_enabled_vfs(struct igb_adapter
> > > *adapter)
> > >  	vf_devfn = pdev->devfn + 0x80;
> > >  	pvfdev = pci_get_device(hw->vendor_id, device_id, NULL);
> > >  	while (pvfdev) {
> > > -		if (pvfdev->devfn == vf_devfn)
> > > +		if (pvfdev->devfn == vf_devfn &&
> > > +		    (pvfdev->bus->number >= pdev->bus->number))
> > >  			vfs_found++;
> []
> > I'll fix this one too.  You start leaning on checkpatch and you get lazy I guess.
> 
> I suppose an indentation rule could be created when
> arguments on multiple lines don't align at the open
> parenthesis, but I'm not going to rewrite emacs
> indentation rules.
> 
> Presumably it should only be used with --strict.
> 
> Anyone think multiple line tests with inequivalent uses
> of parentheses like this one should be noted as well?
> 

I tried to create this very fix last year, but I must admit my
checkpatch.pl foo was not that strong... :)

While it would be a good enhancement to checkpatch.pl, I do not see it
as a "critical" fix.