All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bitbake.conf: Add DATE and TIME to BB_HASH_WHITELIST
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:41:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330339310.4593.4.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62993ba45601c619fad5813647787b7fdbc17f7d.1330329283.git.dongxiao.xu@intel.com>

On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 15:58 +0800, Dongxiao Xu wrote:
> DATE and TIME are not needed when calculating cache's hash value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>  meta/conf/bitbake.conf |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> index 7d0e0d8..d817bcc 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ BB_CONSOLELOG ?= "${TMPDIR}/cooker.log.${DATETIME}"
>  
>  # Setup our default hash policy
>  BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER ?= "OEBasic"
> -BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST ?= "TMPDIR FILE PATH PWD BB_TASKHASH BBPATH DL_DIR SSTATE_DIR THISDIR FILESEXTRAPATHS FILE_DIRNAME HOME LOGNAME SHELL TERM USER FILESPATH STAGING_DIR_HOST STAGING_DIR_TARGET COREBASE PRSERV_HOST PRSERV_PORT PRSERV_DUMPDIR PRSERV_DUMPFILE PRSERV_LOCKDOWN"
> +BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST ?= "TMPDIR FILE PATH PWD BB_TASKHASH BBPATH DL_DIR SSTATE_DIR THISDIR FILESEXTRAPATHS FILE_DIRNAME HOME LOGNAME SHELL TERM USER FILESPATH STAGING_DIR_HOST STAGING_DIR_TARGET COREBASE PRSERV_HOST PRSERV_PORT PRSERV_DUMPDIR PRSERV_DUMPFILE PRSERV_LOCKDOWN DATE TIME"
>  
>  MLPREFIX ??= ""
>  MULTILIB_VARIANTS ??= ""

I think this patch highlights a major difference between your hashing
policy for bitbake's base configuration cache and the hash policy needed
for the signatures and other sstate related pieces.

With siggen, we know we have a target variable (usually a task like
do_compile) and we figure out all its dependencies which we create a
hash of. Its perfectly valid to have that hash depend on DATE or TIME,
if it uses them and we don't want to exclude them.

For the base configuration cache, we don't want to depend on DATE or
TIME. We also don't have one target variable to figure out the
dependencies for, we need to hash every variable with some exclusion
list.

My point is therefore that the above list is very different to the one
bitbake needs for its cache's hash. With that in mind, we probably need
to add a new variable which does something like:

BB_HASHCONFIG_WHITELIST ?= "DATE TIME ${BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST}"

?

Cheers,

Richard






  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-27 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-27  7:58 [PATCH 0/1][PULL] bitbake.conf: Add DATE and TIME to BB_HASH_WHITELIST Dongxiao Xu
2012-02-27  7:58 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Dongxiao Xu
2012-02-27 10:41   ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-02-27 14:01     ` Xu, Dongxiao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1330339310.4593.4.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.