From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7z6x-0004MN-TM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:04:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7z6v-0005iE-To for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:04:11 -0400 Received: from mprc.pku.edu.cn ([162.105.203.9]:40095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7z6v-0005gc-7h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:04:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1331773493.2389.62.camel@epip-laptop> From: Guan Xuetao Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:04:53 +0800 In-Reply-To: <4F607961.2000509@suse.de> References: <1330893156-26569-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1331689198-11076-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1331689198-11076-4-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1331711792.2389.29.camel@epip-laptop> <4F607961.2000509@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] target-unicore32: QOM'ify CPU Reply-To: gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 11:56 +0100, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > Am 14.03.2012 08:56, schrieb Guan Xuetao: > > On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 02:39 +0100, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > >> Embed CPUUniCore32State into UniCore32CPU. > >> > >> Contributed under GPLv2+. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andreas F=C3=A4rber > >> --- > >> Makefile.target | 1 + > >> target-unicore32/cpu-qom.h | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= + > >> target-unicore32/cpu.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= +++++++++++ > > I hope the gpl information for cpu.c and cpu-qom.h could be consisten= t > > with other files. >=20 > Copy&paste from other cpu-qom.h files. :) I can change it to match the > rest of target-unicore32. >=20 > But speaking of matching licenses, your previous text has "as published > by the Free Software Foundation", which I think is a bit safer in theor= y > (no company X can publish a "GPL" v4 of their own and change it to thei= r > liking) and would make the change smaller. For example: >=20 > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modif= y > * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > - * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * published by the Free Software Foundation, or (at your option) any > + * later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory. >=20 > What do you think? >=20 > Andreas >=20 GPLv2+ is ok. Thanks and Regards Guan Xuetao