From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukas Czerner Subject: [PATCH 2/2] e2fsprogs tests: fix f_bad_disconnected_inode e2fsck output Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:34:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1332333293-25028-2-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> References: <1332333293-25028-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> Cc: tytso@mit.edu, Lukas Czerner To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38069 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755914Ab2CUMfB (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:35:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1332333293-25028-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Since we removed EOFBLOCKS_FL flag handling, we have to fix the f_bad_disconnected_inode test so that e2fsck output correspond with the new version of the code where we do not check for the EOFBLOCKS_FL flag at all. Simply remove EOFBLOCKS_FL flag warnings from expect.1 e2fsck output. Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner --- tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 | 9 --------- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 b/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 index d3920e3..11862f6 100644 --- a/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 +++ b/tests/f_bad_disconnected_inode/expect.1 @@ -2,21 +2,12 @@ Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 1 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support. Clear? yes -Inode 9 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1) -Clear? yes - -Inode 10 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1) -Clear? yes - Inode 15 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support. Clear? yes Inode 16 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support. Clear? yes -Inode 13 should not have EOFBLOCKS_FL set (size 0, lblk -1) -Clear? yes